about this page!
I was referred to an atheist's blog post that supposedly
presents ten questions a Christian can't answer. That page is located here.
of the question are answered in "Did God Really Say?". But, I
went ahead and specifically answered the first five on this web site. The answers
are here: 1, 2,
The atheist's page was in
answer to a Christian page quoted by the atheist here: The
Christian Poses Tough Questions to the Atheist. Here are the first five questions
the Christian asked atheists to answer:
- How Did the Universe Come Into
- Why Does There Appear to Be Design (Fine Tuning) in the Universe?
Did Life Originate?
- Why Does There Appear to Be Evidence of Intelligence
- How Did Human Consciousness Come Into Being?
here for THE three questions the Christian should have asked.)
the atheist answer these five questions? With a lot of excuses, misinformation
(scientific error), and propaganda. Here is a summary:
How Did the Universe
Come Into Being?
The Atheist's Answer: I dont know what
caused the universe. I dont even know if asking about a cause (which implies
an action through time) even makes sense before time. (And I say I dont
know simply because Im parroting the consensus view of physics. If
that changes, so will my opinion.)
But theres nothing embarrassing
about pointing out where we dont know things. Science has plenty of unanswered
questions, and highlighting them shows where work needs to be done. Its
not like we've ever learned anything new about nature through holy books or divine
Note also that quantum events may not have causes, and the Big
Bang was a quantum event. Theres no reason to demand a Big Banger, some
supernatural First Cause.
Comments: The atheist's answer
can be summarized as: physicists don't know the answer to this question, and there
are a lot of unanswered questions.
There is something interesting to note
about this answer. It is considered a valid answer for atheists, but not for Christians.
If a question is posed to a Christian, and our answer is, "I don't know."
The response is, "Aha! Then Christianity must be false. You don't have an
answer." But, under their "rules" they are allowed to give this
answer. That's what is called hypocrisy.
Most questions about the Bible
that atheists raise have answers. However, there are some questions the Bible
does not answer, and we won't have those answers until we join Jesus Christ in
The atheist mentions quantum events, and then presents false science.
When working with extremely tiny particles scientists observe what are called
virtual particles emerging, apparently without a cause, from an empty
vacuum. They then say that if this happens in the quantum realm, then something
can come from nothing in the larger world. But, there's a problem. A quantum vacuum
is not empty.
A quantum vacuum is a field with a very low energy level.
That means it is not nothing and the particles are not coming from nothing. In
Times Book Review. Columbia University Philosopher and theoretical physicist
David Albert writes,
vacuum states no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems
are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff. The true relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical
equivalent to there not being any physical stuff at all isn't this or that particular
arrangement of the fields what it is (obviously, and ineluctably, and on
the contrary) is the simple absence of the fields! The fact that some arrangements
of fields happen to correspond to the existence of particles and some dont
is not a whit more mysterious than the fact that some of the possible arrangements
of my fingers happen to correspond to the existence of a fist and some dont.
And the fact that particles can pop in and out of existence, over time, as those
fields rearrange themselves, is not a whit more mysterious than the fact that
fists can pop in and out of existence, over time, as my fingers rearrange themselves.
And none of these poppings if you look at them aright
amount to anything even remotely in the neighborhood of a creation from
Why Does There Appear to Be Design (Fine
Tuning) in the Universe?
The Atheist's Answer: The quick answer
to this question is the multiversean almost infinite number of other universes
defined by different constants. Most of them might be sterile, but there are enough
to make one or more life giving. A multiverse is predicted by well-established
physicsboth string theory and inflation.
Multiverse... meaning there are nearly an infinite number of universes. Some almost
exactly like our own. Some that are very different than our own. Has anyone ever
observed one of these other universes? No. Has anyone been able to detect any
evidence of other universes? No. Let me see if I understand this correctly. I
am supposed to believe in something that is invisible, undetectable, and does
not interact with our universe in any way. And what do atheists say about God?
"It's not rational to believe in something that is invisible, undetectable,
and does not interact with this world." Hypocrites! (Please keep in mind
that God does interact with this world, and those interactions are observable
and have been recorded.)
What about "inflation." What is that?
another unproved, unobserved guess. The idea is that what is called "eternal
inflation" can create other universes. What supposedly happened is that as
the original universe expanded rapidly after the Big Bang, some pockets of space
stop inflating, creating bubbles. Within these bubbles inflation ended allowing
stars and galaxies to form. Each of these bubbles are unique, to the point that
even the laws of physics and fundamental constants may be different. Our bubble
is the one in which everything is just right for life to exist.
of both of these unsubstantiated stories is to create a scenario in which a sufficient
number of galaxies are produced such that one of them randomly turns out to have
exactly the right conditions for life... our universe. Basically what we have
are people who understand that the fine tuning of the universe is direct proof
of God. They are unwilling to accept that truth. What are they doing? They "suppress
the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident
within them." - Romans 1:18 & 19.
Their only option is to invent
theories that give them a way out. Theories that postulate things that are invisible,
undetectable, and that do not interact with "our universe." Exactly
what they say they will not accept when it comes to God.
How Did Life Originate?
Atheist's Answer: Though science has lots of ideas, it doesnt have a good
theory. Nevertheless, science not having an answer gives nothing to the Christian
side of the question.
Comments: One again the atheist's
answer of "I don't know." is taken as being acceptable. A Christian
giving the same answer is vilified. The atheist is right in saying that it is
not correct to assume that because an atheist does not know the answer, that means
God exists and God is the source of all life. All it means is that the atheist
does not know the answer. Maybe he chooses to ignore the evidence of design. Maybe
he is just ignorant of the evidence of design. Or maybe, as scripture says, he
willingly suppresses the truth in unrighteousness. Whatever the reason is (I'll
go with the Biblical one), the atheist's supposed "ignorance" of God
does not mean there is no God. And the atheist's ignorance of how life originated,
does not mean God did not create everything in six days, six thousand years ago.
the other hand Christians do have an answer, and that answer fits perfectly with
all of the evidence. Based on mathematical probability, and the observed beneficial
mutation rate, it is impossible for even a microbe to have "evolved"
in the available time. Yet, atheists ignore this. For a dinosaur to evolve to
become a bird involve changes (such as to the lungs) that would kill the animal.
Yet, atheists ignore this fact. That information never results from randomness,
and that one of the most densely packed information storage systems (DNA) could
never have arisen and accumulated information randomly is ignored and brushed
aside as being inconsequential... ignored by atheists. And the list goes on and
on... the evidence is clear. God created you. And you are accountable to God.
the atheist tries to address some of these in the next question...
Does There Appear to Be Evidence of Intelligence in Biology?
atheist's Answer: Is the marvelous complexity we see in the cell a clue to an
omniscient designer? Or is this clumsy, non-optimal Rube Goldberg machine actually
evidence for evolution? Biologists are satisfied that evolution explains it. Laymen
have no grounds by which to reject the scientific consensus as the best provisional
explanation we have.
As for DNA being strong evidence for intelligence,
guess again. In fact, DNA alone demolishes this Argument from Design. DNA is a
sloppy record of evolution, not the perfect blueprint of an omniscient designer.
Christian might point out that for every instance of information, we find an intelligence
behind it. That may be so, but for every instance of intelligently caused information,
that intelligence is natural, not supernatural.
For all of their devotion to science, I'm continually surprise by how often atheists
reject science and turn to myth and conjecture. For example, they call DNA a "sloppy
record of evolution" because the majority of our DNA is supposed composed
of useless junk left over from failed mutations. It turns out that what they call
"junk DNA" is actually functional and critical to life. (Read
this article in Scientific American). Yes, in reality, DNA is the "perfect
blueprint" (now marred by the entropic effects of sin and the fall) of an
"Intelligence that is nature???" What is
that? Atheists like to attribute "intelligence" to natural selection.
They speak of changes in biology, as though there is an intelligence in _______
that directs those changes. Where is that intelligence? Where does it come from?
How does it work? How does it make decisions? The reality is that God has built
adaptability into every organism. Life can adapt to changing conditions. The intelligence
behind this is God. And that living thinga adapt, DOES NOT mean one type of life
adapts to such a degree that it becomes a different type of life (evolution).
It does mean that there is variability, in response to the environment, that can
be inherited. To learn more about this look up epigenetics.
Final Question: How Did Human Consciousness Come Into Being?
atheist's answer: We have plenty to learn about consciousness, thats certainly
true. Again, sciences long list of unanswered questions does nothing to
support the Christian claim
Comments: Once again the
atheist turns to the "we don't know" defense. The original claim was
that these are questions the atheist cannot answer. That is turning out to be
Be careful of atheist's attempts to give an answer to this question.
Before this question can be answered scientifically, the term "human consciousness"
needs to be defined. This includes the question of morality. Human consciousness
includes the awareness of right and wrong. Why is raping a 12 year old wrong?
Why is murder wrong? Why is there a common awareness that these are wrong?
are three much better questions to
ask an atheist, or anyone. These are the three
questions most people want answered.
Another Question For The Atheist
is obvious that A LOT of effort has gone into attempting to come up with naturalistic
explanations for the overwhelming evidence that reveals your creator God exists.
The a priori assumption is that evolution is true, and God does not exist. Have
you ever examined both sides of this question with an open mind? Honestlty evaulated
the evidence? Not just questioning the truth of the Bible, but seaching to see
if there are legitimate answers to your questions. Then evaulate those answers.
Have you ever truly evaluated Christianity? There are
so many false representations of Christianity. What I'm talking about is true
Biblical Christianity? I've put together a
short web page that explains Christianity in simple terms.
have a "But what about...?" or another type of question, please sent
it to me. Use the contact form to send me your comments,
questions, accusations and corrections.
order your copy on Amazon, click here.